Scroll down for more questions.
1. Summarize the history.
2. Review the initial angiogram. What vascular structures can you identify? Which are patent? Which are occluded. Construct a diagram to show which arteries are patent, which are occluded, and by how much.
3. Review and assess the preoperative echocardiogram.
4. The history indicates three major decisions: the first operation, the hospital discharge, and the second operation. Evaluate each based on the clinical data. Which decisions do you agree with? What would you do differently? What additional information might be helpful?
5. If you had chosen to discharge the patient after the first operation, what would your discharge instructions have looked like?
6. What are the systemic consequences of ongoing pain? Did the patient manifest any of these?
7. Review the emergency room studies and emergency room physician note. What did the venous doppler find? What did the arterial study find? How did the arterial study compare to any prior studies according to the physician note?
8. Evaluate the emergency room physician’s logic in determining the cause of the patient’s pain. Do you agree? Come back to this question after viewing all the videos. Has your assessment changed? If so, why?
9. The emergency room physician documents the word “presume” in the medical record. When is this kind of thinking acceptable in clinical care? Can you give an example of when it is? When it is not? When is it dangerous to make presumptions or assumptions in medicine? Is it ever safe to make a presumption or assumption in medicine? Come back to this question after viewing all the videos. Have your answers changed? If so, why?
10. Even if you do not agree that it is acceptable to make a presumption, does the data support the kind of presumption the physician made? Why or why not?
11. You are the provider. Your patient’s condition worsens, yet available studies remain unchanged. How do you interpret this? How will you proceed? What resources can you draw on? (Revisit this question after studying the case videos.)
12. What are some likely reasons this patient could have died?
13. Come back to the history after viewing all the parts of the case. Reassess the clinical data in light of what you know about the patient’s anatomy and condition. Do you think there were any medical errors? If so, what were they? What data could you review to support your thinking? Do you think there was one error by one person? Or multiple errors by multiple people? Was this a diagnostically difficult case? Or were the errors more easily avoidable? What training issues present here?
14. What is your attitude towards medical errors? Does it depend on the type of error? The outcome? If you think there were errors in this case, what types of errors were there? Is one type more “correctable or preventable” than another? Which could be addressed systemically? Intradepartmentally? Individually?
15. Inventory the physical findings in the video. Based on the history, what is your explanation for each?
Show me what each option does.
I’ll see a video on the left.
On the right I’ll see a list of key terms or an activity.
I’ll see the same video on the left.
On the right I’ll see a list of discussion questions about the video.
I’ll see the same video but with interactive anatomy pins.
On the right I’ll see the list of pins.
*Only on some cases.
I’ll see the same video but I can draw on it and add numbers to label what I’ve drawn.
I’ll have a sketch pad to draw on.
There’s a male body diagram, a female body diagram and also a blank canvas.